Google manual submissions
Featured threads
Most viewed threads in last month
Econsultancy's new site 366 views
Viral Marketing in the Luxury Business? Suitable or not ? 258 views
PPC Reporting Essentials 173 views
Convince me facebook is good for advertising! 150 views
Email - HTML issues in Outlook 2007 and when to send? 138 views
Most active threads in last month
Econsultancy's new site 11 replies
SEO Title characters 9 replies
Viral Marketing in the Luxury Business? Suitable or not ? 7 replies
PPC Reporting Essentials 4 replies
Email - HTML issues in Outlook 2007 and when to send? 3 replies
Jj Solutions
29 September 2008 12:54pm
I have heard of companies recommending submitting websites manually to Google at least 200 times per day, every day.
Personally, I think this is incredibly risky ...what does everyone else think?
CEO at Econsultancy
29 September 2008 14:58pm
As far as I'm aware you can't "submit a website manually to Google". It doesn't necessarily sound risky; just stupid.
Ashley
On 12:54:03 29 September 2008 TamsinArber wrote:
>I have heard of companies recommending submitting websites
>manually to Google at least 200 times per day, every day.
>
>Personally, I think this is incredibly risky ...what does
>everyone else think?
Owner at Wynyard Consultants Ltd
01 October 2008 10:53am
There is a manual submission at http://www.google.co.uk/addurl/ however it's no use for SEM purposes, and I did once hear someone who may have known suggest it was a method used by Google to identify spammers.
I have not submitted a site to Google ever, and we have many top ranking clients and won awards for our search marketing campaigns. In simple terms Google finds you by following links from elsewhere on the web.
Iain Forrest
Jj Solutions
01 October 2008 11:02am
I am doing the seo inhouse for a company who insist I spend an hour a day maunually submitting the website to Google add URL.
Prior to this, the optimisation I had been doing was mainly to the pages themselves, with a few high quality article submissions. This produced good results - Google page 1 for all search words required.
Unfortunately the company had advise from a 'professional' and was told they need to buy 1000's of backlinks and manually submit to Google everyday.
As far as I am concerned this is unethical SEO, It is spamming Google and contrivening Googles webmaster guidelines.
Since submitting pages to Google the website has dropped quickly from page 1 to page 2. Yet the company is insistent this must be because it isn't being submitted to Google enough. I hate to see the work I have put in go waste because some apparent expert has recommended this method of seo.
I have provided seo for 5 websites, all are on page 1 without submitting to Google at all.
.On 10:53:48 1 October 2008 Wynyard wrote:
Owner at Wynyard Consultants Ltd
01 October 2008 11:20am
That sounds unfortunate ...
Hard to say exactly why the site would have fallen, but continual resubmission is nonsense in my view. Once in the index you're in the index, and Google has a process for deleting any duplicate versions of your page that might slip through.
The sudden appearance of 1000s of (possibly not that relevant) backlinks won't do you any ranking favours either. Google is monitoring your "Linking Profile" and a step change like this may raise an alarm as it's unlikely to happen because of "natural" linking to good quality content etc and they'll see it as the sort of spamming tactic that it probably is.
Sounds like you were doing a good job before; nothing beats long term commitment to developing good quality content.
Good luck convincing your boss!
Online Marketing at Red Ant Design
01 October 2008 11:47am
Google only needs to find your website once to be able to begin to index the information. If you are setting up an entirely new domain name, then by all means, submit your URL to Google ONCE, and only when the site is live.
The best way to get your website found by search engines is to actively promote and market your company across the internet - presence is key.
CEO at Econsultancy
01 October 2008 14:03pm
Yes, there is that, though I've always understood that more as a 'request to spider' than a 'submission to Google'.
I guess there's no harm doing it once if you've got a new domain but from all that I've heard you'll still get spidered much more quickly by getting a decent link from a reputable site (and one that is spidered frequently).
So more of a PR/marketing challenge. Actually press release distribution is a good and easy starting point to do this. It doesn't really help your rankings (it used to work better) but it is good for getting your site indexed and 'on the radar'.
Companies use our own press release distribution service (http://www.e-consultancy.com/about/advertising/press-release-distribution.asp) effectively for just this.
Ashley
On 10:53:48 1 October 2008 Wynyard wrote:
MD at Mr Zen Ltd
02 October 2008 08:27am
Hi TamsinArber - Resubmitting is a complete waste of time - once your page is in the index, it's in the index. Set up google site maps properly and give google honest information about how frequently the pages are updated, then leave it alone to work on the content of your site, and to work on getting quality backlinks.
As for buying '1000's' of backlinks, this is more worrying - I've been optimising travel sites across europe for many years, and can promise you that a single link from a trustworthy, high quality and relevant site will have more impact than 1000's of links from 'spammy' pages... You've got to ask - where are they getting these links from anyhow??
It's tough when your boss gets duff advice - keep pressing and collecting evidence.. Alternatively, I'm sure there are many proper SEO experts who actively post to this website who I'm sure would be more than willing to offer half an hour of FOC advice to your boss to try to straighten things out - I certainly would be happy to do this.
Good luck
Matt
www.mrzen.co.uk
MD at White Hat Media
02 October 2008 09:28am
Mulitple submissions like this is utterly pointless and ridiculous. I often wonder where these people read about this sort of rubbish.
When optimising a site, it's important that we understand the thinking and logic behind the people who created and manage the search engines and this is something I always bang on about to clients.
Apparently Google employ more PHDs than anyone in the world and would they be so stupid as to let their algorithm be influenced by multiple url submissions?
Ironically it's not necessary to submit the url of a site to Google at all and hasn't been necessary for years. Have links to your sites and the Search Engines will find you. As you've noticed you have top spots without submitting.
If a client starts saying this sort of nonsense state your case firmly and tell them you'll do it and have to charge for it but it's not necessary. Even find a white paper that rubbishes this sort of nonsense.
Alternatively and this is the more ethical action, if they insist on this, resign the account as it sounds like it will end in tears anyway. Leave the door open though and it's likely they'll be back.
Hope that helps,
Jem
White Hat Media
On 11:02:52 1 October 2008 TamsinArber wrote:
Jj Solutions
02 October 2008 09:49am
Thank you everyone for your responses on this matter. Unfortuntaely there are plenty of seo companies out there who are only interested in giving stupid advise to naive people to make money. None of these so called experts know anything at all about creating or editing a website. I find it hard to comprehend how anyone can truly achieve results if they cannot optimise the website itself. My method always involves quality content first, internal links and relevant search words within the page text, title and description. If a site is created that is designed with the user in mind, gives the relevant information that they are looking for then surely over time that counts for alot. I publish articles, created a blog and have encouraged the creation of links via social networking sites. I have spent a great deal of time to produce an informative website that prioritises the user and is search engine friendly too.
I know buying links that will be placed in directories and websites that are purely there just to contain paid for links is a stupid thing to do. Quality not quantity is key. I have told my boss that submitting to google is pointless as the website is already indexed. Her reaction was that a professional had advised her that this was essential. The crazy thing is, the website was page 1 for every search word it could have been there for. It didn't need optimising any further or differently.
On 09:28:44 2 October 2008 JeremySpiller1 wrote: