Ad trafficking: resource required
Featured threads
Most viewed threads in last month
Econsultancy's new site 311 views
Viral Marketing in the Luxury Business? Suitable or not ? 238 views
PPC Reporting Essentials 164 views
Convince me facebook is good for advertising! 142 views
Email - HTML issues in Outlook 2007 and when to send? 135 views
Most active threads in last month
Viral Marketing in the Luxury Business? Suitable or not ? 7 replies
Econsultancy's new site 7 replies
SEO Title characters 7 replies
eCommerce order processing software suggestions 5 replies
PPC Reporting Essentials 4 replies
Managing Director at Irazu Ltd.
17 August 2006 14:34pm
We're looking into using Double Click for a client that's about to launch a new site with online advertising.
Any ideas on how much resource is required for ad trafficking? Initially the client will launch one site and is expecting around 200,000 page impressions per month. This will probably be done in-house but have unsure whether this is a full time job and if so what skills are required.
Also, any feedback on Double Click or alternatives...?
Managing Director at Lemon Traffic
17 August 2006 16:45pm
Hi Louise,
Doubleclick is one of the leading adservers on the market, so you are not going too far wrong with the solution.
As for ad trafficking, i do reckon on a 200k a month site, i wouldn't think you would need more than 20 hours work per month for trafficking, campaign management and optmisation.
I would advise having someone on board that has publisher trafficking experience and is familar with the chosen adserver.
There are lots of adservers out there on the market. They all have their strengths and weaknesses, it just depends on what you are looking for and what your budget is.
Feel free to contact me if you want more advise on ad serving and trafficking. I am always happy to help, you can email me on joni@lemontraffic.com
e-consutancy also have a good buyers guide to ad serving solutions that you can check out.
All the best
Joni Mallett
www.lemontraffic.com
On 14:34:20 17 August 2006 LouiseK wrote: